Comparison

GradeAid vs Gamma

A general-purpose AI presentation, document and website generator. Not education-specific: no curriculum model, no student-facing classroom layer.

Gamma pricing: Free tier with 400 starting AI credits; Plus at $10/user/month; Pro at $20/user/month, or $15/month billed annually; Enterprise available. Checked against their site in August 2026.

Feature by feature

GradeAid vs Gamma
Capability	GradeAid	Gamma
Built from national curriculum standards	Yes	No
Lesson plans & multi-week series	Yes	No
Ready-to-teach slide decks¹	Yes	Yes
Printable worksheets with answer keys	Yes	No
Auto-graded quizzes	Yes	No
Send to students as homework	Yes	No
Free tier for individual teachers	Yes	Yes
EU-based company & GDPR-native data handling²	Yes	Not published

1.Gamma's decks are excellent and highly customisable — this is the row where it genuinely beats us.
2.Gamma does not publish EU data residency terms for education use.

A hollow circle means partial support and a question mark means the company has not published an answer either way — we would rather say so than guess.

Which one should you actually use?

Pick Gamma if…

If what you actually need is the best-looking deck and you are happy to write the pedagogy yourself, Gamma's design output and branding controls are stronger than anything a teacher-specific tool ships today.

Pick GradeAid if…

If the deck is one artefact of a lesson rather than the whole job. GradeAid produces the plan, the slides, the worksheet and the quiz from the same curriculum objective, then sends them to students — Gamma stops at the slides.